The Revenant (unpublished review for Manchester Confidential, posted here because bored on lunchbreak)
USA ǀ 2015 ǀ 156 minutes
Dir. Alejandro G. Iñárritu ǀ Leonardo DiCaprio ǀ Tom Hardy ǀ Domhnall Gleeson
How do you make an original end-of-the-world movie in 2015? One way is to set it in the nineteenth-century American Midwest. Having carried off several statuettes at last year’s Academy Awards for multiple-personality-disorder comedy Birdman, the uncompromising independent filmmaker Alejandro Iñárritu returns with something completely different: an epic revenge drama pitched somewhere between Aguirre: Wrath of God and Rocky, but with less hubris and more shots of comets.
A group of hunters and trappers operating deep in the wilderness is attacked by a Native American tribe called the Ree. After a savage battle the survivors begin a gruelling trek back to their fort, but it isn’t long before another misfortune befalls them, as their scout, Hugh Glass (DiCaprio), is mauled by a bear. Seemingly on the point of death, he’s left behind with three men, whose orders are to tend to him and ensure he gets a proper burial. But Glass – whose Balboa-esque motto is ‘never give up’ – stubbornly refuses to die. When the unscrupulous Fitzgerald (Hardy) attempts to expedite the process, killing Glass’s son for good measure, the injured frontiersman crawls out of a shallow grave and sets off in search of revenge.
The Revenant is a brutal and spectacular film that can’t quite bring itself to settle for brutality and spectacle. It reaches for some higher meaning – something to do with how the death of an individual relates to the death of an entire people, and how western man has pillaged the earth, and how behind our differences we are all the same. But whatever this meaning is, the The Revenant fails to grasp it, falling back on blunt symbolism and a posturing authenticity. Much has been made of the strenuous conditions of the shoot, but it’s not clear these privations added a great deal to the end product, except in the very basic sense that it’s difficult to photograph snow-capped mountains without going where there are snow-capped mountains. DiCaprio has scowled his way through movies before, and will surely do so again; are we supposed to think that this time he really meant it?
The film also suffers from occasional lapses into what can only be termed ‘survivalist camp’. In one scene Glass rides a horse off a cliff, disembowels it and crawls into the carcass for warmth, finally emerging – naked – to the strains of Messiaen’s Quartet for the End of Time. Delightfully grizzly as this sounds, the dual associations of The Empire Strikes Back and Nazi concentration camps make for a confusing ambiance. Perhaps ‘Eye of the Tiger’ would have been more appropriate?
Of course, none of this matters too much. The Revenant is worth watching just for the breath-taking cinematography of Emmanuel Lubezki – a frequent collaborator of both Iñárritu and Terrence Malick – who captures a landscape of pitiless beauty in which the presence of human beings seems like an absurd mistake. Forests shiver in the wind, rivers surge seaward, distant mountains shrug off capes of pristine snow. And through it all trudges Academy Award-nominee Leonardo DiCaprio, scowling. It seems at times as though someone has taken a Sebastião Salgado album and pasted in production photos from The Basketball Diaries.
Werner Herzog’s kamikaze runs into the heart of darkness were inspired by his – bonkers – existentialist philosophy, and the absurdist results are right there on the screen. Who can forget the sight of Klaus Kinski strutting up and down a makeshift raft in the middle of the jungle, shouting insults at God in front of a crowd of tiny, child-faced monkeys? Unfortunately, The Revenant has nothing as bold or bizarre as this to offer. It looks like it was shot by a team of consummate professionals working under capable management to a well-designed schedule. Which is to be commended, of course – it’s how good films are made – but what about the monkeys?